|
More News Notes |
Existing welfare policies as well as proposals advocated by Bush Administration appointees could devastate gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender (GLBT) families and individuals, according to a report released today by the Policy Institute of the National Gay and Lesbian Task Force.
Welfare reform proposals could effectively bar children of GLBT parents and single or unmarried heterosexual parents from eligibility for benefits like access to Head Start programs and low-interest student loans. Other initiatives could ban GLBT people from adopting or accessing fertility clinics, make divorce much harder to obtain, and stigmatize GLBT youth in the nation's schools. The report, Leaving Our Children Behind: Welfare Reform and the Gay, Lesbian, Bisexual and Transgender Community, analyzes welfare reform, its impact on poor GLBT people, and the threats posed to the entire GLBT community.
"Gay, lesbian, bisexual, and transgender people are placed at grave risk by welfare reform. These initiatives are fundamentally about family policy about promoting particular kinds of families while penalizing and stigmatizing others," said Lorri L. Jean, executive director of the National Gay and Lesbian Task Force. "Welfare is an issue of concern to all of us because how we treat the most vulnerable in our society says a lot about who we are."
Featured prominently is the so-called "charitable choice" faith-based initiative. It threatens to hand over entire social service sectors - $80 billion over 10 years to anti-GLBT religious providers who can legally discriminate against GLBT people and people of other religions, and who can engage in sectarian proselytizing with tax dollars.
The welfare reform act of 1996, officially called the Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act, is up for reauthorization in 2002. The outcome will surely be influenced by former prominent conservative movement leaders who now hold key policy-making positions within the Bush Administration, such as Wade Horn, Don Eberly, and Andrew Bush. Leaving Our Children Behind documents their reactionary agenda to further change social service provision in the United States. While measures such as fatherhood initiatives, (heterosexual) marriage initiatives, abstinence-only education, and charitable choice may stem from good intentions, they make for bad public policy. Some of the more extreme proposals include: